Trump Loses Bid for Total Secrecy for Cohen Probe Documents

Trump Loses Bid for Total Secrecy for Cohen Probe Documents

A federal decide mentioned U.S. President Donald Trump ought to publicly file his objections to findings of a court-appointed particular grasp reviewing paperwork seized in a probe of the enterprise dealings of his longtime private lawyer, Michael Cohen.

In an order issued on Friday, U.S. District Decide Kimba Wooden in Manhattan rejected efforts by Trump, the Trump Group and Cohen to file their objections fully beneath seal.

She agreed with the federal government that the filings ought to be public besides as to parts that “disclose the substance of the contested paperwork.”

Particular Counsel Robert Mueller

Wooden mentioned she would determine later which parts might be sealed.

Joanna Hendon, a lawyer for Trump, didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark. Todd Harrison, a lawyer for Cohen, didn’t instantly reply to comparable requests.

The legal probe into Cohen’s enterprise dealings stems partially from a referral by Particular Counsel Robert Mueller, who’s investigating whether or not Trump’s 2016 marketing campaign colluded with Russia to affect that 12 months’s U.S. presidential election.

Trump has repeatedly mentioned there was no collusion, and Russia has denied interference. Cohen has not been criminally charged.

Former decide opinions seized supplies

The particular grasp, former federal decide Barbara Jones, is reviewing supplies seized in April raids of Cohen’s dwelling, workplace and resort room, to find out that are topic to attorney-client privilege.

On Monday, she mentioned in a report that 162 recordsdata, out of greater than 292,000 reviewed up to now, have been privileged or partially privileged, and 7 have been “extremely private.”

Roughly three.7 million recordsdata have been seized, Cohen’s attorneys have mentioned. Jones is reviewing solely those who attorneys for Trump, the Trump Group and Cohen imagine is likely to be privileged.

The case is Cohen v U.S., U.S. District Courtroom, Southern District of New York, No. 18-mj-03161.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *